Treating, Understanding Substance Use in Pregnant Women

APRIL 25, 2020
Kevin Kunzmann
Kimberly A. Yonkers, MD

Kimberly A. Yonkers, MD

In 2018, 233,000 (9.9%) pregnant women in the US reported to have drank alcohol in the last month. Another 271,000 (11.6%) reported using tobacco products, and 128,000 (5.4%) reported using illicit drugs.

The stark reality of very prevalent substance use in pregnant women is a deeply troubling fact—but it is a well-documented fact which experts have been able to stratify and define for the sake of preventive efforts.

In a virtual presentation as part of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) Spring Highlights Meeting 2020, Kimberly A. Yonkers, MD, of the Yale University School of Medicine, discussed national data-based understandings of substance use among women who are pregnant. Yonkers also appealed for the implementation of both universal and health equity approaches to addressing the prevalence of such cases.

Yonkers—who has received grant support from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Doris Duke Foundation—shared the high rates of differing substance use among pregnant women, as per the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH).

The data showed the most commonly used illicit drug among pregnant women since at least 2015 has been marijuana, followed by opioids, and then cocaine.

What’s inconsistent is the timing of substance use among pregnant women. Yonkers noted data showing that women most primarily use substances in their first trimester than the latter 2. This would imply substance use decreases among women throughout their pregnancy.

But regardless of time to use, pregnant women face significant challenges in achieving abstention—the median time to alcohol abstinence during pregnancy with gestation was 132 days (±6) in a 2015 assessment of 184 participants; times were even more severe for cigarettes (146±10 days), cocaine (149±8 days), and marijuana (152±6 days).

In the same assessment, median time to postpartum relapse for each substance was 128 (±21), 110 (±27), 288 (±96), and 138 (±25) days, respectively.


Substance effects

The effect in newborns is varied across substances. Opioid use disorder (OUD) during pregnancy, which Yonkers noted has been increasing over the last 2 decades, can increase the risk of preterm birth, week-plus hospitalizations following birth, oligohydramnios, intrauterine growth restriction, and more.

Of course, neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome can have immediate symptomatic burdens on infants—and long-term health risks. Though such assessments for the latter are limited by cohort follow-up and older clinical methadone use, investigators have observed risks of memory and executive function deficits, speech and language deficits, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and more. Such issues are more prevalent in boys than girls.

Cocaine and similar stimulants can cause something more similar to a residual toxicity than a withdrawal syndrome at birth; within days postnatal, infants can suffer from jitteriness, sleep disturbances, poor habituation, and even abnormal EEG & seizures. Long-term, children whose mothers used cocaine during pregnancy have been linked to early initial use of alcohol and marijuana.

Cannabis exposure can cross the blood/placenta barrier and harm cannabinoid receptors—a critical component to fertility, implantation, and fetal development.

Nicotine use during pregnancy results in an approximately doubled risk of ectopic pregnancy, as well as placental disorders. Fetal or infant death, as potentially enhanced by fetal growth restriction, is associated with a two- to three-fold greater risk among the approximate 13% of women who report smoking during pregnancy.

Alcohol exposure, as known commonly is associated with worsened risk for pediatric cognition issues, structural damage to the child’s brain, delayed motor and speech, hearing impairments, and mental retardation.


Solutions

Yonkers noted that all but 5 states have previously attempted to prosecute women for fetal substance exposure in the past—86% of all charges have been overturned or dismissed on appeal. Most commonly, opinions which lead to dismissals or reversals stated laws were not intended to include fetuses when defining a child or victim.

In 2 states where convictions for fetal substance exposure were successful and upheld by State Supreme Courts—Alabama and South Carolina—laws allowed for the charge of a pregnant woman putting a child at chemical endangerment, as well as the distinction of a fetus as a person.

Citing organizations including the Council on Patient Safety in Women’s Health Care, Yonkers stated that clinicians should ensure all patients with substance use disorders are enrolled in treatment programs, with family planning and breastfeeding support incorporated into relevant cases.

Coordination should also be assured between the primary provider and the patient, and child welfare should be contacted in safe care protocols.

Among the most effective clinical interventions, she noted, include brief psychological interventions, medication-assisted treatment, and cognitive behavioral therapy for the substance user.

Both in-person and electronic screening & brief intervention (SBI) programs have been associated with increased substance abstinence in users—though e-SBI has a more distinct benefit for pregnant women using illicit drugs, Yonkers explained.

Yonkers called for understanding that, though substance use remains lower among pregnant women than those who are not pregnant, it is a severely detrimental risk to both the mother’s and child’s long-term health, and a combination of care team collaboration and proven therapies should be prepared to address it.

Copyright© MD Magazine 2006-2020 Intellisphere, LLC. All Rights Reserved.